11/7/2022 0 Comments Intel quicksync and blender![]() ![]() Given how we tested both VivoBook Pro models by disabling the 3050 chips, I’d expect the retail units that only ship with the AMD/Intel chips to perform better thanks to optimized BIOS and drivers. Take these with a lump of salt, though, as the Radeon Vega results are within 10% of what we tested on other laptops at similar power ( such as in the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro), but the Iris scores are 15-30% lower in comparison to other Core i7 H28 and H35 laptops that we’ve tested at similar power levels ( such as in the ZenBook 14X). We also ran some GPU tests with the RTX 3050 chips disabled, indicative of what you’d get on these two platforms if you opted for the more affordable configurations the rely solely on integrated Vega/Iris graphics. In all fairness, the Intel platform should have a slight edge in Adobe Photoshop or Premiere, which would benefit from its higher clocks and QuikSync support, but we didn’t get to run PugetBench on those.įor the most part, though, the AMD configuration is the better balanced and more capable choice here. Once more, the Ryzen platform wins in the CPU-heavy loads such as Blender or V-Ray, and the two are neck in neck in GPU and combined loads, but with a slight advantage for the AMD platform when it comes to editing video content in Davinci Resolve. We also ran some Workstation related loads, on the same Performance profiles. The GPU scores are identical between the two since both are the same Nvidia RTX 3050 dGPU, with Optimus.Īs for the CPU-side, the i7-11370H wins over the Ryzen 7 5800H by 2-7% in single-core loads, but trails behind in multi-threaded loads by anywhere between 50-80%. It’s important to mention that both run on 16 GB of DDR4-3200 memory in dual-channel, soldered on the motherboard and non-upgradeable, but there’s a slightly faster 1 TB SSD on the AMD model, which slightly impacts the PCMark10 scores, but should not influence the others. Intel quicksync and blender full#OK, so here’s our full suite of benchmarks on these two platforms. We’ve also confirmed these findings in the more taxing Cinebench R23 test, in which case the CPUs ended running at the same 45+W sustained on the Intel model and 54+W on the AMD unit, with higher temperatures and noise levels on the latter. I’ll also add that both these processors stabilize at roughly 85-90% of their maximum potential in these VivoBook Pro mid-tier designs, and they would be able to perform 7-15% higher in beefier notebooks with more complex cooling modules. ![]() Both are within their design tolerances, though. On the Performance profile, while the Intel CPU averages 82-84 degrees Celsius on Performance mode in this test, the AMD CPU runs at 88-90 degrees Celsius. This test clearly favors the 8C/16T Ryzen 7 5800H processor, which ends up outscoring the 4C/8T Core i7-11370H by as much as 80% on the Performance profile, by 2x on the middle-ground Standard profile, and by almost 3x when the two laptops run in battery mode.Īt the same time, the Ryzen configuration also runs at slightly higher power in all cases, which results in a slight increase in noise levels over the Intel variant, as well as higher internal temperatures. So with that out of the way, we’ll first touch on the sustained CPU multi-core performance in the Cinebench R15 loop test, which runs the same test for 15+ times in a loop, with 1-2 sec delay between each run. Intel Core i7-11370H vs AMd Ryzen 7 5800H comparison in the same chassis These are the kind of information we go over in our reviews. We’ll touch on this down below, as this aspect would weigh in heavily if you decide to opt for configurations without any sort of dedicated graphics.īefore we get to talk benchmarks and numbers on the two Vivobook Pro 15 models down below, make sure to understand that not all laptops are created equal and that the performance is going to differ between units, based on their power settings and thermal designs. For the most part, the Intel solution is up to 25% faster in GPU loads and games, based on our tests. Furthermore, the Intel chips also benefit from a few extra perks such as support for faster PCIe gen4 storage, better WiFi+ integration, and support for Thunderbolt 4.0 or QuickSync.īoth chips come with integrated graphics, with Radeon Vega on the AMD processor and Iris Xe on the Intel side. ![]() On the other hand, the higher single and multi-core clocks of the Intel Core H35 chip, corroborated with the improvements in IPC over the Ryzen Zen3 platform, allow it an advantage in single-core clocks and light daily multitasking. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |